But this time I get The firmware encountered an unexpected exception. And unfortunately, because Ventoy is derived from GRUB 2.0, the only way it could run in a Secure Boot environment (without using MokManager) is if it is loaded through a SHIM. This same image I boot regularly on VMware UEFI. Ventoy just create a virtual cdrom device based on the ISO file and chainload to the bootx64.efi/shim.efi inside the ISO file. Sorry for my ignorance. But i have added ISO file by Rufus. Secure Boot is disabled in the BIOS on both systems, and the ISO boots just fine if I write it directly to a USB stick with Fedora Image Writer. Is there any progress about secure boot support? debes desactivar secure boot en el bios-uefi I have the same error with EndeavorOS_Atlantis_neo_21_5.iso using ventoy 1.0.70. the EndeavorOS iso boots with no issues when on it's on usb, but not through ventoy. @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. Option2: Use Ventoy's grub which is signed with MS key. Indeed I have erroneously downloaded memtest v4 because I just read ".iso" and went for it. Oh and obviously, once that is done, Ventoy will need to make sure that it's not possible to run an older versions of it, in a Secure Boot environment where a newer version has been enrolled, as it would still defeat the whole thing. So even when someone physically unplugs my SSD and installs a malicious bootloader/OS to it, it won't be able to decrypt the main OS partition. The user should be notified when booting an unsigned efi file. The only thing that changed is that the " No bootfile found for UEFI!" It was actually quite the struggle to get to that stage (expensive too!) 1.0.84 MIPS www.ventoy.net ===> Format XFS in Linux: sudo mkfs -t xfs /dev/sdb1, It may be related to the motherboard USB 2.0/3.0 port. But, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM and that's actually the reason why it could be signed by Microsoft (once I switched the bootloader license from GPLv3+ to GPLv2+ and rewrote a UEFI driver derived from GPLv2+ code, which I am definitely not happy at all about), because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, it can not be used to chain load anything that isn't itself Secure Boot signed. Hopefully, one of the above solutions help you fix Ventoy if its not working, or youre experiencing booting issues. Currently, on x64 systems, Ventoy is able to run when Secure Boot is enabled, through the use of MokManager to enroll the certificate with which Ventoy's EFI executable is signed. Copy the efisys.bin from C: > Windows > Boot > DVD > EFI > en-US to your desktop 3. Again, detecting malicious bootloaders, from any media, is not a bonus. Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. Ventoy does support Windows 10 and 11 and users can bypass the Windows 11 hardware check when installing. The main point of Secure Boot is to prevent (or at least warn about) the execution of bootloaders that have not been vetted by Microsoft or one of the third parties that Microsoft signed a shim for (such as Red Hat). fdisk: Create a primary partition with partition type EFI (FAT-12/16/32). How did you get it to be listed by Ventoy? Well, that's pretty much exactly what I suggested in points 1-4 from the original post, with point 4 altered from "an error should be returned to the user and bootx64.efi should not be launched" to "an error should be returned to the user who can then decide if they still want to launch bootx64.efi". boots, but kernel panic: did not find boot partitions; opens a debugger. For instance, if you produce digitally signed software for Windows, to ensure that your users can validate that when they run an application, they can tell with certainty whether it comes from you or not, you really don't want someone to install software on the user computer that will suddenly make applications that weren't signed by you look as if they were signed by you. In the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view, https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file, [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1. Open File Explorer and head to the directory where you keep your boot images. I'll think about it and try to add it to ventoy. Set the VM to UEFI mode and connect the ISO file directly to the VM and boot. If you have a faulty USB stick, then youre likely to encounter booting issues. WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso BOOT but Custom launcher cannot open custom path and unable access to special apps. Can't try again since I upgraded it using another method. Hi, thanks for your repley boot i have same error after menu to start hdclone he's go back to the menu with a black windows saying he's loading the iso file to mem and that it freez. The latest version of the open source tool Ventoy supports an option to bypass the Windows 11 requirements check during installation of the operating system. Can you add the exactly iso file size and test environment information? Installation & Boot. So, yeah, if you have access to to the hardware, then Secure Boot, TPM or whatever security measure you currently have on consumer-grade products, is pretty much useless because, as long as you can swap hardware components around, or even touch the hardware (to glitch the RAM for instance), then unless the TPM comes with an X-Ray machine that can scan and compare hardware components, you're going to have a very hard time plugging all the many holes through which a dedicated attacker can gain access to your data. I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. That's actually very hard to do, and IMO is pointless in Ventoy case. mishab_mizzunet 1 yr. ago The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I believe GRUB (at least v2.04 and previous versions if patched with Fedora patches) already work exactly as you've described. Tested Distros (Updating) I don't have a IA32 hardware device, so I normally test it in VMware. Ventoy doesn't load the kernel directly inside the ISO file(e.g. Latest Laptop UEFI 64+SECURE BOOT ON Blocked message. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. But it shouldn't be to the user to do that. Legacy\UEFI32\UEFI64 boot? Then Ventoy will load without issue if the secure boot is enabled in the BIOS. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. So I don't really see how that could be used to solve the specific problem we are being faced with here, because, however you plan to use UEFI:NTFS when Secure Boot is enabled, your target (be it Ventoy or something else) must be Secure Boot signed. same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy ? 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. Thanks. How to suppress iso files under specific directory . I cannot boot into Ventoy with Secure Boot enabled on my machine though, it only boots when I disable Secure Boot in BIOS. How to make sure that only valid .efi file can be loaded. Yet, that is technically what Ventoy does if you enrol it for Secure Boot, as it makes it look like any bootloader, that wasn't signed by Microsoft, was signed by Microsoft. Results when tested on different models\types of x86 computers - amount of RAM, make/model, latest BIOS? Option1: Use current solution(Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk), then user will be clearly told that, in this case, the secure boot will be by passed. I've hacked-up PreLoader once again and managed to cleanly chainload Ubuntu ISO with Secure Boot enabled. Optional custom shim protocol registration (not included in this build, creates issues). Hi, HDClone 9.0.11 ISO is stating on UEFI succesfully but on Legacy after choose "s" or "x64" to start hdclone it open's a black windows in front of the Ventoy Menu and noting happens more. Turned out archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64 is not compatible. Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. If you burn the image to a CD, and use a USB CD drive, I bet you find it will install fine. Have a question about this project? Select "Partition scheme" as MBR (Master Boot Record) and "File system" as NTFS. Which brings us nicely to what this is all about: Mitigation. it doesn't support Bluetooth and doesn't have nvidia's proprietary drivers but it's very easy to install. Expect working results in 3 months maximum. Because if I know you ever used Ventoy in a Secure Boot enabled environment, I can now run any malicious payload I want at the UEFI level, on your computer. may tanong po ulit ako yung pc ko po " no bootfile found for uefi image does not support x64 uefi" i am using ventoy galing po sa linux ko, gusto ko po isang laptop ko gawin naman windows, ganyan po lagi naka ilang ulit na po ako, laptop ko po kasi ayaw na bumalik sa windows mula nung ginawa ko syang linux, nagtampo siguro kaya gusto ko na po ibalik sa windows salamat po sa makakasagot at sa . All other distros can not be booted. if this issue was addressed), it could probably be Secure Boot signed, in the same manner as UEFI:NTFS was itself Secure Boot signed. I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. Attached Files Thumbnail (s) Find Reply Steve2926 Senior Member Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. You signed in with another tab or window. 2.-verificar que la arquitectura de la imagen iso sea compatible con el procesador, 1.-modo uefi: Ventoy also supports BIOS Legacy. This means current is UEFI mode. what is the working solution? This is definitely what you want. When secure boot is enabled, only .efi/kernel/drivers need to be signed. If you pull the USB drive out immediately after finish copy a big ISO file, most probably the file in the USB will be corrupted. If you did the above as described, exactly, then you now have a good Ventoy install of latest version, but /dev/sdX1 will be type exFAT and we want to change that to ext4, so start gparted, find that partition (make sure it is unmounted via right click in gparted), format it to ext4 and make sure to . For example, how to get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. cambiar contrasea router nucom; personajes que lucharon por la igualdad de gnero; playa de arena rosa en bahamas; eficompress infile outfile. They can choose to run a signed Ubuntu EFI file and Ventoy can change it's default function using scripts and file injection. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. Keep reading to find out how to do this. It gets to the root@archiso ~ # prompt just fine using first boot option. Although a .efi file with valid signature is not equivalent to a trusted system. So if the ISO doesn't support UEFI mode itself, the boot will fail. The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. check manjaro-gnome, not working. Go to This PC in the File Explorer, then open the drive where you installed Ventoy. It woks only with fallback graphic mode. Great , I also tested it today on Kabylake , Skylake and Haswell platforms , booted quickly and well. 3. Sign in New version of Rescuezilla (2.4) not working properly. /s. Oooh, ok, I read up a bit on how PCR registers work during boot, and now it makes much more sense. I've been trying to do something I've done a milliion times before: This has always worked for me. https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT Especially, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM, and I don't maintain a set of signatures that I allow binaries signed with through. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI." UEFI64 Bootfile \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi is present. Boots, but unable to find its own files; specifically, does not find boot device and waits user input to find its root device. However, I'm not sure whether chainloading of shims are allowed, and how it would work if you try to load for example Ubuntu when you already have Fedora's shim loaded. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-KDE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 952MB I guess this is a classic error 45, huh? ^^ maybe a lenovo / thinkpad / thinkcentre issue ? I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains Questions about Grub, UEFI,the liveCD and the installer. to your account, MB: GA-P110-D3, CPU: Intel Core i5 6400, RAM: 8GB DDR4, GPU: IGFX + NVIDIA GT730, MB: GA-H81M-S2PV, CPU : Intel Core i3 4650, RAM 8GB DDR3 GPU: IGFX, slitaz-rolling-core-5in1.iso Users have been encountering issues with Ventoy not working or experiencing booting issues. Open net installer iso using archive manager in Debian (pre-existing system). @steve6375 As I understand, you only tested via UEFI, right? Official FAQ I have checked the official FAQ. etc. There are many kinds of WinPE. No bootfile found for UEFI, maybe the image doesnt support ia32 uefi error, asus t100ta Kinda solved: Cant install arch, but can install linux mint 64 bit. So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. This completely defeats Secure Boot and should not happen, as the only EFI bootloader that should be whitelisted for Secure Boot should be Ventoy itself, and any other EFI bootloader should still be required to pass Secure Boot validation. (I updated to the latest version of Ventoy). Both are good. It says that no bootfile found for uefi. plist file using ProperTree. Strelec WinPE) Ctrl+r for ventoy debug mode Ctrl+h or h for help m checksum a file After install, the 1st larger partition is empty, and no files or directories in it. Hope it would helps, @ventoy I still have this error on z580 with ventoy 1.0.16. @pbatard Sorry, I should have explained my position clearer - I fully agree that the Secure Boot bypass Ventoy uses is not secure, and I'm not using Ventoy exactly because of it. Rik. to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. and select the efisys.bin from desktop and save the .iso Now the Minitool.iso should boot into UEFI with Ventoy. I will test it in a realmachine later. When Secure Boot is enabled, BIOS boot (CSM) should not work at all, since it would completely defeat the purpose of only allowing signed executables to boot. Sign in plzz help. JonnyTech's response seems the likely circumstance - however: I've The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result, It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU, The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. I've already disabled secure boot. Won't it be annoying? I'm afraid I'm very busy with other projects, so I haven't had a chance. I've made another patched preloader with Secure Boot support. Boot net installer and install Debian. Already on GitHub? Thanks a lot. Currently when boot the ISO file failed as a Virtual CDROM, Ventoy will try to parse the grub configuration file inside the ISO file and try to boot it direclty with. I installed ventoy-1.0.32 and replace the .efi files. I think it's ok as long as they don't break the secure boot policy. Thus, being able to check that an installer or boot loader wasn't tampered with is not a "nice bonus" but is something that must be enforced always in a Secure Boot enabled environment, regardless of the type of media you are booting from, because Secure Boot is very much designed to help users ensure that, when they install an OS, and provided that OS has a chain of trust that extends all the way, any alteration of any of the binary code that the OS executes, be it as part of the installation or when the OS is running, will be detected and reported to the user and prevent the altered binary code to run. @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . The current release of Slax (slax-64bit-11.2.1.iso) fails to boot using UEFI64 using ventoy with the error message: Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. , Laptop based platform: And I will posit that if someone sees it differently, or tries to justify the current behaviour of Ventoy, of letting any untrusted bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled, they don't understand trust chains, whereas this is pretty much the base of any computer security these days. All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. Then user will be clearly told that, in this case only distros whose bootloader signed with valid key can be loaded. arnaud. By default, secure boot is enabled since version 1.0.76. You are receiving this because you commented. Tried it yesterday. I will not release 1.1.0 until a relatively perfect secure boot solution. Please refer: About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE. And, for any of this to work, Ventoy would still need to independently solve the problem of allowing unsigned bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled @ventoy (Haswell Processor) Tested in Memdisk and normal mode with 1.0.08b2. Reboot your computer and select ventoy-delete-key-1.-iso. @chromer030 hello. Okay, I installed linux mint 64 bit on this laptop before. But of course, it's your choice to pick what you think is best for your users and the above is just one opinion on the matter. @ventoy I can confirm this, using the exact same iso. and leave it up to the user. No, you don't need to implement anything new in Ventoy. When user check the Secure boot support option then only run .efi file with valid signature is select. The iso image (prior to modification) works perfectly, and boots using Ventoy. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. The live folder is similar to Debian live. I adsime that file-roller is not preserving boot parameters, use another iso creation tool. Sorry for the late test. If so, please include aflag to stop this check from happening! Fix PC issues and remove viruses now in 3 easy steps: download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, Brother Printer Paper Jam: How to Easily Clear It, Fix Missing Dll Files in Windows 10 & Learn what Causes that. Nierewa Junior Member. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_april_2020_x64_dvd_aa945e0d.iso | 5 GB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_x64_dvd_d06ef8c5.iso | 5 GB I'm not talking about CSM. Please thoroughly test the archive and give your feedback, what works and what don't. ParagonMounter ISO: GeckoLinux_STATIC_Plasma.x86_64-152.200719..iso (size: 1,316MB) . That is to say, a WinPE.iso or ubuntu.iso file can be booted fine with secure boot enabled(even no need for the user to whitelist them) but it may contain a malicious application in it. Now there's no need to format the disk again and again or to extract anything-- with Ventoy simply copy the ISO file to the USB drive and boot it. After boot into the Ventoy main menu, pay attention to the lower left corner of the screen: https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250 And it's possible that the UEFI specs went as far as specifying that specific aspects of the platform security, such as disk encryption through TPM, should only be available if Secure Boot is enabled. For more information on how to download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, we have a guide for that. Yes, I already understood my mistake. Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. Say, we disabled validation policy circumvention and Secure Boot works as it should. I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. try 1.0.09 beta1? @steve6375 my pleasure and gladly happen :) This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. If the ISO is on the tested list, then clearly it is a problem with your particular equipment, so you need to give the details. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. Where can I download MX21_February_x64.iso? Ubuntu.iso). - . Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. da1: quirks=0x2. unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250, https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists, chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin, https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso, https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s, https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA. Sorry, I meant to upgrade from the older version of Windows 11 to 22H2. The program can be used to created bootable USB media from a variety of image formats, including ISO, WIM, IMG and VHD. if this issue was addressed), it could probably be Secure Boot signed, in the same manner as UEFI:NTFS was itself Secure Boot signed. So it is impossible to get these ISOs to work with ventoy without enabling legacy support in the bios settings? 6. Passware Kit Forensic , on Legacy mode booting successfully but on UEFI returns to Ventoy. unsigned kernel still can not be booted. Also ZFS is really good. md5sum 6b6daf649ca44fadbd7081fa0f2f9177 Point 4 from Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements states: Code submitted for UEFI signing must not be subject to GPLv3 or any license that purports to give someone the right to demand authorization keys to be able to install modified forms of the code on a device. legacy - ok The idea that Ventoy users "should know what they are getting into" or that "it's pointless to check UEFI bootloaders for Secure Boot" once Ventoy has been enrolled is disingenuous at best. That's not at all how I see it (and from what I read above also not @ventoy sees it). Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat The worst part is, at the NSA level, this is peanuts to implement, and it certainly doesn't require teams of coders or mathematicians trying to figure out a flaw or vulnerability. Thnx again. Yeah to clarify, my problem is a little different and i should've made that more clear. I'm getting the same error when booting "Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso" or "pop-os_20.04_amd64_intel_8.iso" on either a new ThinkPad X13 or T14s using Ventoy 1.0.31 UEFI. ventoy.json should be placed at the 1st partition which has the larger capacity (The partition to store ISO files). its existence because of the context of the error message. What matters is what users perceive and expect. I am not using a grub external menu. So, Secure Boot is not required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. 4. I am getting the same error, and I confirmed that the iso has UEFI support. Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB Snail LInux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. That is the point. Windows 10 32bit Shim itself is signed with Microsoft key. @ValdikSS Thanks, I will test it as soon as possible. It . Code that is subject to such a license that has already been signed might have that signature revoked. With ventoy, you don't need to format the disk over and over, you just need to copy the ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI. Hi FadeMind, the woraround for that Problem with WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso is that you must copy the SSTR to the root of yout USB drive than all apps are avalaible. If that was the case, I would most likely sign Ventoy for my SHIM (provided it doesn't let through unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled, which is the precise issue we are trying to solve) since, even if it's supposed to be a competitor of Rufus, I think it's a very nice solution and I'm always more than happy to direct people who would like to have a multiboot version of Rufus to use Ventoy instead. It typically has the same name, but you can rename it to something else should you choose to do so. This iso seems to have some problem with UEFI. It's a pain in the ass to do yes, but I wouldn't qualify it as very hard. How to mount the ISO partition in Linux after boot ? FreeNAS-11.3-U2.1.iso (FreeBSD based) tested using ventoy-1.0.08 hung during boot in both bios and uefi at the following error; da1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present The only way to prevent misuse when booting from USB is to set a BIOS password (and perhaps a boot password), set the BIOS to not boot from USB and it won't hurt to also use an encrypted filesystem for the OS on the hard disk (bitlocker/LUKS). Aporteus which is Arch Linux based version of Porteus , is best , fastest and greatest distro i ever met , it's fully modular , supports bleeding edge techs like zstd , have a tool to very easily compile and use latest version of released or RC kernel directly from kernel.org ( Kernel Builder ) , have a tool to generate daily fresh ISO so all the packages are daily and fresh ( Aporteus ISO Builder ) , you can have multi desktops on a ISO and on boot select whatever you like , it has naturally Copy to RAM feature with flag to copy specific modules only so linux run at huge speed , a lot of tools and softwares along side mini size ISO , and it use very very low ram and ISO size, You can generate ISO with whatever language you like to distro have.